Tuesday, May 12, 2020

Trump Organization: Biggest Criminal Cabal in American History & Total History

My tax records must never see the light of day
(Protect them at all costs – even with your life)

Three-ring criminal cabal without any doubt
(All three now on a very hot seat)

Two on-going high-level Court cases illustrate the truthfulness of this post today:

First on-going case is at the U.S. Supreme Court and is highlighted below – entire article here from the Washington Post.

USSC hearing today on challenges to Trump not wanting his financial records turned over to congress or some state AG’s … these two key parts:

This first case on-going against Trump is at the U.S. Supreme Court where they heard oral arguments involving in three separate lawsuits Trump has filed to stop officials from seeing those returns.

a. On is made up of two congressional subpoenas from two House committees for Mazars (Trump’s umbrella accounting firm) records.

b. One is directed at Deutsche Bank (Trump’s main bank).

c. One involves investigation request from the Manhattan (NY) DA.

Trump believes he should be excused not just from congressional oversight, not just from criminal investigation, not just from questioning by the press, but even from politics itself.

It’s important to understand that even if the court rules against him and his tax returns are turned over, it isn’t as though the next day we’ll all finally learn what Trump has worked so hard to hide for all these years.

Why not? Trump and his shady accountants have constructed his financial affairs to be as opaque and confusing as possible so that even the IRS won’t have the resources to unravel them.

For example: The Trump Organization is not one company in the way we ordinarily think of one. His is an amalgam of about 500 separate LLC’s.

For example, even if there’s a line on a return saying Trump got $5 million from “Nothing to See Here Partners LLC,” just knowing that is only the starting point. Why?

For each one of those 550 LLC’s you’d have to (1) figure out who’s involved and where the money comes from before you could even start to understand what kinds of malfeasance he was engaged in, (2) who he’s in bed with, or (3) how he might be compromised.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The second big court case story also comes from the Washington Post, re: Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan puts a hold on AG Barr’s move to have the DOJ drop charges against Michael Flynn.

However, the Judge’s ruling to put a hold on the DOJ action now is best summed up in the famous words from Yogi Berra who once quipped: “It ain’t over till it’s over.”

Highlights from this fine piece:

Judge Sullivan’s order came after the DOJ took the highly irregular step of reversing its stance on Flynn’s guilty plea charges and thus embracing Flynn’s move to dismiss his own two guilty pleas. 

Flynn was convicted of lying to FBI agents about his contacts with Russia’s ambassador about easing U.S. sanctions during Trump’s 2016 presidential transition in S/C Robert Mueller’s investigation into that whole affair.

Flynn had initially repeated that he was guilty of lying, that no one had coerced him to admit his guilt and that he had no intention of taking back that plea. Flynn then took responsibility for wrongdoing that also culminated in his firing by Trump for misleading VP Pence, White House aides, and the public.

In making his ruling Judge Sullivan said “he will at the appropriate time set a schedule for outside parties to argue against the DOJ Claims.

Sullivan’s invitation could set the stage for adversarial proceedings in which one or more attorneys argue against the DOJ. It would also permit, if Sullivan chooses, to require both sides to produce evidence and revisit the case for and against Flynn. 

In such an evidentiary hearing, Sullivan could call witnesses, such as Flynn, his investigators, or even prosecutor to obtain more facts about how the case was handled, and why Flynn and agents took the steps they did.

Recall that Sullivan has not hesitated to personally question Flynn in court before, as he did during an abortive 2018 sentencing hearing, when he rejected a defense motion supported by the government for probation.

My 2 cents: Also, in this case as I noted above: “It ain’t over till it’s over.”

Thus, we have a long way to go – no doubt in either case and hopefully the outcome in both cases will go against Trump, and I strongly they will, and rightly so. 

It is about time Trump is held accountable, and stops acting like a tyrant on a rampage – which he has been now for over three years, so stay tuned.

Thanks for stopping by.




No comments: