Me, me,
me — “It's my
natural ability I get it”
(CDC
Atlanta, March 6)
A rather long post today – bear with
me:
Lead-in
based on the picture above – in Trump’s own words, not mine when he visited CDC in Atlanta
(March 6, 2020) and boasted to reporters during his tour of the CDC where he
met with actual doctors and scientists who are feverishly scrambling to contain
and combat the deadly COVID-19 illness.
He said he likes
to say that he fell into politics almost by accident, suggested he would have
thrived in another profession — as a medical expert adding: “I like this stuff.
I really get it.”
He then cited
a “great, super-genius uncle” who taught at MIT saying it must run in the
family genes, “Because people are really surprised I understand this stuff. Every
one of these doctors said, “How do you know so much about this?” Maybe I have a
natural ability.”
That session
explains what we now about his inaction to this deadly virus in the NY Times story
below that is 100%
absolutely a great article put together by nine
NY Times reporters (via MSN) – with this headlines:
He Could
Have Seen What Was Coming: Behind Trump’s Failure on the Virus
Brief History:
A week after the *first coronavirus case had been identified in the
United States, and six long weeks before Trump finally took aggressive action
to confront the danger the nation was facing — a pandemic that is now forecast
to take tens of thousands of American lives — Dr. Carter Mecher at the VA was urging the upper ranks of the
nation’s public health bureaucracy to wake up and prepare for the possibility
of far more drastic action.
* Press release from the CDC (January 21, 2020): CDC today is confirming that the
first case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV later called COVID -19) in the
United States in the state of Washington. The patient recently returned from
Wuhan, China, where an outbreak of pneumonia caused by this novel coronavirus
has been ongoing since December 2019.
While originally thought to be spreading from
animal-to-person, there are growing indications that limited person-to-person
spread is happening. It’s unclear how easily this virus is spreading between
people. The patient from Washington with a confirmed infection returned to the
United States from Wuhan on January 15, 2020.
The patient sought care at a
medical facility in Washington, where the patient was treated for the illness.
Based on the patient’s travel history and symptoms, healthcare professionals
suspected this new coronavirus.
A clinical specimen was collected and sent to
CDC overnight, where laboratory testing yesterday confirmed the diagnosis via
CDC’s Real time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) test.
Time line since then:
Trump repeatedly played down the seriousness of the
virus and focused on other issues, an array of figures inside his government —
from top White House advisers to experts deep in the cabinet departments and
intelligence agencies — identified the threat, sounded alarms, and made clear
the need for aggressive action.
Trump though, was slow to absorb the scale of the risk
and to act accordingly, focusing instead on controlling the message, protecting
gains in the economy, and batting away warnings from senior officials.
January 28: In an email to a group of public
health experts scattered around the government and universities Dr. Mecher wrote: “Any way you cut it, this is going to be bad. The projected size of the
outbreak already seems hard to believe.”
January 31: Trump takes his first concrete
action — limiting travel from China — but public health often
had to compete with economic and political considerations in internal debates,
slowing the path toward belated decisions to seek more money from Congress,
obtain necessary supplies, address shortfalls in testing, and ultimately move
to keep much of the nation at home.
Trump’s
responses were always colored by his suspicion of and disdain for what he
viewed as the “Deep State” (people
left over from the Obama years those Trump hates with a passion) — the very
people in his government whose expertise and long experience might have guided
him more quickly toward steps that would slow the virus, and likely save lives.
Decision-making was also complicated by a long-running dispute inside the
administration over how to deal with China.
The virus at
first took a back seat to a desire not to upset Beijing during trade talks, but
later the impulse to score points against Beijing left the world’s two leading
powers further divided as they confronted one of the first truly global threats
of the 21st century.
The shortcomings of Trump’s performance have played
out with remarkable transparency as part of his daily effort to dominate
television screens and the national conversation during the virus task force
briefings (now on-going).
But dozens of interviews with current and former
officials and a review of emails and other records revealed many previously
unreported details and a fuller picture of the roots and extent of his halting
response as the deadly virus spread.
■ The NSC, office responsible for tracking pandemics received
intelligence reports in early January predicting the spread of the virus to the
United States, within weeks was raising options like keeping Americans home
from work and shutting down cities the size of Chicago. Trump avoided such steps until March.
■ January 29: Despite
Trump’s denial weeks later, he was told at the time about a memo produced by his trade adviser, Peter Navarro,
laying out in striking detail the potential risks of a coronavirus pandemic: as
many as half a millions deaths and trillions of dollars in economic losses.
■ January 30: HHS
Secretary, Alex Azar, directly
warned Trump of the possibility of a pandemic during which was the second
warning he delivered to the president about the virus in two weeks. The
president, who was on Air Force One while traveling for appearances in the
Midwest, responded that “Azar was being alarmist.”
■ February: Azar
publicly announced that the government was establishing a
“surveillance” system in five American cities to measure the spread of the
virus and enable experts to project the next hot spots. It was delayed for
weeks. The slow start of that plan, on top of the well-documented failures to develop the nation’s testing capacity, left
administration officials with almost no insight into how rapidly the virus was
spreading. “We were flying the plane with no instruments,” one official said.
■ February (3rd week):
The administration’s top public health experts concluded they should recommend
to Trump a new approach that would include warning the American people of the
risks and urging steps like social distancing and staying home from work. But
the White House focused instead on messaging and crucial additional weeks went
by before their views were reluctantly accepted by the president — time when
the virus spread largely unimpeded.
■ March: Trump finally agreed in mid-March to recommend social distancing
across the country, effectively bringing much of the economy to a halt, he
seemed shell shocked and deflated to some of his closest associates. One
described him as “subdued” and “baffled” by how the crisis had played out. An
economy that he had wagered his re-election on was suddenly in shambles.
Trump only
regained his swagger, an associate said, from conducting his daily White House
briefings, at which he often seeks to rewrite the history of the past several
months.
He declared at one point saying publicly that he felt it was a pandemic long before it was called a pandemic and
insisted at another that he had to be a cheerleader for the country as if that explained why
he failed to prepare the public for what was coming.
Trump’s
allies and some administration officials say the criticism has been unfair.
The Chinese
government misled other governments, they say. And they insist that the
president was either not getting proper information, or the people around him
weren’t conveying the urgency of the threat. In some cases, they argue, the
specific officials he was hearing from had been discredited in his eyes, but
once the right information got to him through other channels, he made the right
calls.
For example, said Judd Deere, a White
House spokesman said:
“While the media and Democrats refused to
seriously acknowledge this virus in January and February, President Trump took
bold action to protect Americans and unleash the full power of the federal
government to curb the spread of the virus, expand testing capacities and
expedite vaccine development even when we had no true idea the level of transmission
or asymptomatic spread.”
There were
key turning points along the way, opportunities for Trump to get ahead of the
virus rather than just chase it. There were internal debates that presented him
with stark choices, and moments when he could have chosen to ask deeper
questions and learn more.
How he handled them may shape his re-election
campaign. They will certainly shape his legacy.
Major takeaway from this article that show the real
dangerous nature and style of Trump a truly serious crisis that underscores the
need to have him out of office in November – he is in a word “A
clear and present danger” to the country.
Two key points based on the evidence
and facts:
1. From the time the virus was first identified
as a concern, the administration’s response was plagued by the rivalries and
factionalism that routinely swirl around Trump and, along with the president’s
impulsiveness, undercut decision making, and policy development.
2. Faced
with the relentless march of a deadly pathogen, the disagreements and a lack of
long-term planning had significant consequences. They slowed the president’s
response and resulted in problems with execution and planning, including delays
in seeking money from Capitol Hill, and a failure to begin broad surveillance
testing.
The efforts
to shape Trump’s view of the virus began early in January, when his focus was
elsewhere:
■ The fallout from his decision to kill Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani, Iran’s
security mastermind.
■ His push for an initial trade deal with China.
■ His Senate impeachment trial, which
was about to begin.
Even after Azar
first briefed him about the potential seriousness of the virus during a phone
call on January 18 while the president was at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, Trump
projected confidence that it would be a passing problem.
A few days
later while attending the World Economic Forum in Switzerland Trump he told an interviewer: “We have it totally under control. It’s going to be just fine.”
Back in
Washington, voices outside of the White House peppered Trump with competing
assessments about what he should do and how quickly he should act. The efforts
to sort out policy behind closed doors were contentious and sometimes only
loosely organized.
That was the case when the NSC convened
a meeting on short notice on the afternoon of January 27.
The
Situation Room was standing room only, packed with top White House advisers,
low-level staffers, Trump’s social media guru, and several cabinet secretaries.
There was no checklist about the preparations for a possible pandemic, which
would require intensive testing, rapid acquisition of protective gear, and
perhaps serious limitations on Americans’ movements.
Instead,
after a 20-minute description by Azar of his department’s capabilities, the
meeting was jolted when Stephen Biegun,
the newly installed deputy secretary of state, announced plans to issue a level four travel warning, strongly discouraging Americans
from traveling to China. The room erupted into bickering.
A few days
later, on the evening of January 30,
Mick Mulvaney, the acting White
House chief of staff at the time, and Azar called Air Force One as the
president was making the final decision to go ahead with the restrictions on
China travel. Azar was blunt, warning that the virus could develop into a pandemic
and arguing that China should be criticized for failing to be transparent.
Trump rejected the idea of criticizing China, saying
the country had enough to deal with. And if the president’s decision on the
travel restrictions suggested that he fully grasped the seriousness of the
situation, his response to Azar indicated otherwise.
“Stop panicking,” Trump told Azar.
That
sentiment was present throughout
February, as the president’s top aides reached for a consistent message but
took few concrete steps to prepare for the possibility of a major public health
crisis.
During a briefing
on Capitol Hill on February 5,
senators urged administration officials to take the threat more seriously. Several
asked if the administration needed additional money to help local and state
health departments prepare.
Derek Kan, a senior official from the OMB replied
that the administration had all the money it needed, at least at that point, to
stop the virus, two senators who attended the briefing said.
Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) wrote in a tweet shortly after: “Just left the Administration briefing on Coronavirus. Bottom line: they
aren’t taking this seriously enough.”
My 2 cents: This great article continues
here and you will note that it is very long and very detailed. My
earlier related post is
here.
Also, ref: my post that follows this one. If he hires only the best, how come he never listens to them and takes their expert advice? Oh, yeah, he gets it — it's in his genes, right? Okee dokee then, never mind.
Also, ref: my post that follows this one. If he hires only the best, how come he never listens to them and takes their expert advice? Oh, yeah, he gets it — it's in his genes, right? Okee dokee then, never mind.
I simply plucked highlights to fit the blog – but main
article is worth your time. It surely is a keeper to build on chapter by chapter
until this crisis is over – which it will be, but right now no one knows when
for sure – best guess near the end of the year.
Good news is that a team in the UK thinks they may
have a vaccine by September.
History is now before us and still unfolding and being
written by the Trump administration led by the biggest boob ever in that office
a totally incompetent man when it comes to government management and especially
in desperate times like now.
How his base can stick with him in such times is truly
amazing.
My last point: More troubling is to see what one man
can do to America in only three years is astonishing after all we have come
through in nearly 244 years – what we see today is frankly unbelievable.
Thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment