Tuesday, September 26, 2023

Trump in a Legal Vise Grip: Just Like the 1987 Movie Title "No Way Out"

His #1 goal no matter what it takes
(Trump family members could follow we suppose)

Why did Trump announce for the Presidency so early? I believe he wanted to use that & be able to say:I’m a candidate – you can’t touch me.” 

That answer to that is here: No protection. 

Plus this CNN article headline his other “shield” he thinks – also not so:

“Trump asks judge to reject gag order requested by prosecutors in federal election interference case”

Trump’s attorneys argued in a court filing Monday (Sep. 25) that a gag order requested by special counsel Jack Smith in the federal 2020 election interference case is unconstitutional, overly broad and an effort to censor the former president during the 2024 presidential race saying: “The Proposed Gag Order is nothing more than an obvious attempt by the Biden Administration to unlawfully silence its most prominent political opponent.”

Trump is asking U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to deny the prosecutor’s request for a gag order entirely, requesting a hearing on the matter. Chutkan, an Obama appointee overseeing the criminal case in Washington, DC, hasn’t yet made a decision on the request for a gag order. 

DOJ prosecutors previously said a limited gag order on the former president is needed to protect the integrity of the trial in March. 

The prosecutor’s argument for a gag order pointed to false public statements Trump previously made around the 2020 election: “To erode public faith in the administration of the election and intimidate individuals who refuted his lies.”

The federal election interference investigation is one of four criminal cases against Trump who is facing four charges including obstruction of an official proceeding and conspiracy to defraud the United States. 

Prosecutors previously asked Chutkan to reel in Trump’s public statements and posts on social media and specifically asked the judge:To limit Trump’s ability to speak about the identity, testimony, or credibility of prospective witnesses, statements about any party, witness, attorney, court personnel, potential jurors that are disparaging and inflammatory or intimidating.”

Trump’s attorneys wrote in their filing:The prosecution may not like President’s Trump’s entirely valid criticisms, but neither it nor this Court are the filter for what the public may hear. Let’s be clear: The prosecution hopes to create a contempt trap for President Trump and his attorneys.”

FYI: Trump already has been ordered not to intimidate potential witnesses, or talk to them about the facts of the case.

My 2 Cents: The Judge’s ruling is do very soon. Stay tuned – will be updated.

Thanks for stopping by.


No comments: