Dark days
in America over two years continues
(The eyes
behind that darkness)
I thought long and hard about this post and its
impact, if any, but I feel compelled to post and say the things I feel strongly
about. So, here goes.
I
say: “Just because a president, any
president has the power to do something or anything that does mean he has to do
it.”
With Trump, it is painfully obvious
that the rule of law doesn’t matter. There are literally tons of reasons and
examples to impeach and remove Trump from office for his abuse of power and
abuse of the office.
The following story puts the proverbial icing on the cake.
Story Background: According to a Daily
Caller report,
the Trump administration is considering invoking the Insurrection Act to give federal troops the power to detain and
remove undocumented immigrants in the United States, acting essentially as ICE
agents.
If Trump follows through on this plan, it would be a staggering abuse
of authority, on par with Trump’s declaration and national
emergency act to build the border wall.
The Insurrection
Act of 1807: United States Federal law (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255) (until
2016, found at 10 US Code, Chapter 15, §§ 331–335, renumbered to 10 USC,
Chapter 13, §§ 251–255) that governs the ability of the President to
deploy military troops within the United States to put
down lawlessness, rebellion, and insurrection.
The Insurrection
Act is an exception to the general rule, enshrined in the Posse Comitatus Act,
that presidents may not use the military as a domestic police force.
The Insurrection Act allows the president to deploy federal troops to suppress domestic uprisings and enforce the law when civilian law enforcement is impeded or overwhelmed. The president can deploy troops if there's an insurrection or invasion on U.S. soil. As its name suggests, Congress intended the law to be used only in the most extraordinary situations, and only where absolutely necessary to preserve civil order.
The Insurrection Act allows the president to deploy federal troops to suppress domestic uprisings and enforce the law when civilian law enforcement is impeded or overwhelmed. The president can deploy troops if there's an insurrection or invasion on U.S. soil. As its name suggests, Congress intended the law to be used only in the most extraordinary situations, and only where absolutely necessary to preserve civil order.
The Posse Comitatus Act, 1878: Also, a Federal law that makes it a crime to use the military as a domestic police force in the United States under most circumstances. The law was designed to end the use of federal troops to supervise elections in the post–Civil War South.
My
insert:
Insurrection refers to an act or instance of revolting against civil
authority or an established government. It is a violent revolt against an
oppressive authority.
Insurrection is different from riots and offenses connected with mob violence.
Insurrection is different from riots and offenses connected with mob violence.
In insurrection there is an organized and armed
uprising against authority or operations of government whereas riots and
offenses connected with mob violence are simply unlawful acts in disturbance of
the peace which do not threaten the stability of the government or the
existence of political society. For the most
part, presidents have
honored this intent.
The law has not been invoked since 1992, when George H.W. Bush used it to help suppress massive riots in Los Angeles following the acquittal of police officers for the brutal beating of Rodney King.
The law has not been invoked since 1992, when George H.W. Bush used it to help suppress massive riots in Los Angeles following the acquittal of police officers for the brutal beating of Rodney King.
Posse comitatus, in the words of
one former DOD official: “It reflects “one of the clearest
political traditions in Anglo-American history: that using military power to
enforce the civilian law is harmful to both civilian and military interests.”
Deploying
soldiers as police officers not only violates democratic sensibilities; it
increases the risk that interactions with civilians could go disastrously
wrong, as armed forces are not trained in conducting law enforcement
activities. On the flip
side, every soldier engaged in law enforcement is being pulled away from
military priorities.
Related FYI:
The Oath of Enlistment for Enlistees: “I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that
I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all
enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to
the same; and that I will obey the orders of the
President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me,
according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me
God.”
The Oath of Office for Officers: “I, _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic,
that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this
obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and
that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I
am about to enter; So help me God.”
(Note: Officer's oath does not mention obeying the president / any president
only obey the Constitution, e.g., the Rule of Law).
My 2 cents: As cited above, the president
seeks to harness an authority clearly intended for the most dire and unusual of
circumstances to deal with a long-standing issue that does not come close to
posing an urgent or overwhelming threat.
In these two cases, Trump’s goal is not to avert a
catastrophe, but to score political points with his base and consolidate his
own power.
In my opinion and I’m sure of thousands of legal
experts a lot smarter than me would agree that Trump is the most lawlessness
president ever, again abusing his power and misusing the military.
We don't face now nor do we have anything remotely close to any insurrection, foreign invasion, traditional war, massive civil disconnect,
riots across the land, or civil unrest – not one bit.
This man is the civil unrest with his abuse of power
and his office.
Shame on us for allowing this to go on
this long.
Trump must be impeached by the DEM House, and if the
GOP-run Mitch McConnell Senate (as he already promised publicly) will vote not
remove Trump, then the Republicans will pay the price at the ballot box.
This is huge – the biggest eventful shame in American history for
sure.
It speaks directly to our very survival as a nation, a country of laws
not men, and to who we are as a people.
Thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment