CinC (Commander-in-Chief) or “Conspirator-in-Charge”
(Pondering his next scheme)
Proof,
meet pudding
What
super amazing story here by reporter Scott Shane – he should win a Pulitzer Prize for
this – my take on it:
Washington: In an April 2017 interview with
the Associated Press, Trump
suddenly began talking about the hack of the DNC a year earlier,
complaining that the FBI had not physically examined the compromised server,
when he said: “They brought in another
company that I hear is Ukrainian-based.”
“CrowdStrike?” the surprised
reporter asked, referring to the California cybersecurity company that
investigated how Russian government hackers had stolen and leaked Democratic
emails, disrupting Hillary Clinton's campaign.
Trump resumed: “That's
what I heard. Heard it's owned by a very rich Ukrainian; that's what I heard.”
Counter to Trump’s conspiracy
BS from Wired.com
– key part:
CrowdStrike said in an
official statement: “With regards to our investigation of the DNC
hack in 2016, we provided all forensic evidence and analysis to the FBI. As
we’ve stated before, we stand by our findings and conclusions that have been
fully supported by the U.S. intelligence community.”
Related
here from The Atlantic – same topic.
Now, more than two years later, Trump
is still holding on to this same wild, false, and crazy conspiracy theory.
For example, in his July call
with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump summed up the call in a
sort of shorthand — at least according to the White House
memorandum, labelled “not a verbatim transcript.”
Trump said: “I
would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with
Ukraine, they say CrowdStrike … I guess you have one of your wealthy people …”
It is unclear
whether the ellipses indicate that words were omitted or that Trump's voice was
trailing off.
Then Trump added one
novel detail: “The server, they say Ukraine has it.”
Note: No, Mr. Trump. CrowdStrike IS NOT Ukrainian. It is an American owned
and operated company in California.
CrowdStrike is a reputable, reliable, and very trustworthy and
frequently complimented on by the FBI and others company. Agencies praise them for their honest and
thorough work.
So,there is not there, Mr. Trump – so, put a sock in it…!!!
That Trump call asking Ukraine to look into his version of CrowdStrike forms the background to the current House impeachment inquiry, which is focused on the second request he made: That
Zelensky investigate Trump's possible 2020 opponent, former vice-president Joe
Biden.
Trump has placed a concoction of disprovable claims,
of the kind usually found on the fringes of the web, squarely in the middle of
American politics and diplomacy.
The tale of the supposedly hidden server may
have appealed to Trump because it undercut a well-established fact that he has
resented and resisted for three years: The Russian government interfered in the
2016 election to help him win, an effort thoroughly documented by American
intelligence agencies and amply supported by public evidence.
Trump flat out does not believe our own intelligence agencies - he trusts Putin.
By contrast,
there is no evidence to support Trump's vague suggestion that Ukraine, not
Russia, might be responsible for the hacking, or that CrowdStrike somehow
connived in it.
But this
alternate history has provided a psychological shield for the President against
facts that he believes tarnish his electoral victory.
Trump has long called for better relations with
Vladimir Putin's Russia and brushed aside complaints about its conduct.
So there is a certain symmetry to his suggestion that
Ukraine, Russia's opponent and the victim of its territorial grab, may somehow
have framed Russia for the 2016 election activity.
Nina Jankowicz, a fellow at think tank
the Wilson Center in Washington, who regularly visits Ukraine is writing a
book called: “How to Lose the Information War” said: “Ukraine is the perfect scapegoat for him [Trump], because it's the enemy of Russia.”
Jankowicz further
notes that a number of Ukraine-linked stories, some of them distorted or
exaggerated, have been pulled together by Trump's supporters into this his single
narrative.
My 2 cents: Trump is a life-long and highly-skilled
con man – there is no doubt about that.
But he always has devious intentions
that only benefit himself and his family and their financial gain from any
source and any way possible regards of who gets damaged by their tactics along
the way.
In the end, all that matters is the Trump brand with them always coming out on top – that is a proven fact.
Thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment