Friday, May 3, 2019

GOP Dirty Tricks: Past from Atwater, Stone, Rove, and Bannon — Now From Trump

Fetch Lies and Dirty Tricks” 
(Good Dawg) 

Trump's fav phrase Fake News
(But, never fake from him)

Whew boy, here we go again … Trump camp dirty tricks redux – related article for 2020 election (a run down on DEM candidates here).

This story headline:

Lock her up redux? Biden’s son becomes the right’s new target

Highlights and introduction from this story:

Trump’s political allies and his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani have begun mobilizing to cast a legal cloud over Joe Biden and demanding that the DOJ should open an investigation that could ensnare the former vice president as he launches his 2020 presidential bid.

Giuliani (May 2) tweet:Biden conflicts are too apparent to be ignored and should be investigated quickly and expeditiously.”

The suggestion of illegal behavior and the specter of putting a political opponent behind bars sounded familiar to some senior campaign aides to Hillary Clinton, who believe Trump and his allies are running a version of their “Crooked Hillary” playbook from 2016.

Says Jesse Ferguson, a senior spokesperson on the Clinton campaign: Last time, he had the right-wing conspiracy media to boost his chants of lock her up, but this time he's going to actually weaponize the federal government against our nominee.”

The attacks on Biden pivot off the lucrative business activities of his son Hunter during the Obama administration, most notably Hunter’s work on the board of a Ukrainian energy company, Burisma Holdings.

As part of a long campaign to pressure Ukraine to combat corruption in 2015 and 2016, then-Vice President Biden leveraged financial aid to the country in order to persuade the government to fire the country’s top prosecutor.

Full story continues at the link.

My 2 cents: What is driving this latest? This might help answer that:

* Giuliani has been suggesting that the Biden case must be investigated as part of the larger inquiry into the origins of the Russia investigation, which may involve Ukraine. 

In a Fox News interview in early April, Giuliani spoke at length about the Biden case but said it was only because of broader questions about the Russia investigation, saying: “I'm bringing it up now because I want Ukraine — I don't care about Joe Biden. I want that Ukraine investigated. Because I think in the Ukraine, we are going to find a lot of answers for how the Steele dossier was put together.

Then AG Barr told Congress that he is looking into the origins of the Russia investigation.

* KEY BACKGROUND:  Some veterans of Democratic presidential campaigns see echoes of 2016 in the way the story had staying power in the conservative media ecosystem and then gradually reemerged into the mainstream.

Dan Pfeiffer, former Obama aide, tweeted:It's happening all over again. Peter Schweizer does oppo research funded by conservative interests -- > NYT credulously writes it up -- > Trump and his allies bully the DOJ into investigating -- > Trump claims his opponent is corrupt.”

Ken Vogel, the story’s author responded: “If you think this is oppo from @peterschweizer or @RudyGiuliani, you did not read the story very carefully.

Schweizer then responded to Pfeiffer on Twitter:It's called investigative journalism not oppo research. What facts to do dispute?”

More info on Schweizer: He is a conservative journalist who published “Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends” in 2018, a book looking at potential corruption of Republican and Democratic establishment figures. 

On the cover, Biden features prominently and is joined by Barack Obama, Mitch McConnell, Jared Kushner, and John Kerry. The book dedicates significant portions to Hunter Biden’s private-sector work, including in Ukraine.

Schweizer also is the author of the 2015 bookClinton Cash” with the encouragement of Breitbart’s Steve Bannon.

He is also the president of the Government Accountability Institute, a group funded by the Mercer family — which also bankrolled Breitbart at the time of “Clinton Cash.” The book was ultimately cited in a large investigation by The New York Times about a Russia uranium deal and a subsequent story about the Clinton Foundation’s work in Haiti.

More on that Uranium-One story here and my input:

Bogus Claim: Hillary Clinton as secretary of state, was involved of the transfer of U.S. uranium reserves to the new Russian owners of an international mining operation in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.

Facts: The mining company, Uranium One, was originally based in South Africa, but merged in 2007 with Canada-based UrAsia Energy.
Shareholders there retained a controlling interest until 2010, when Russia’s nuclear agency, Ros-atom, completed purchase of a 51% stake.

Hillary Clinton played a part in the transaction insofar as it involved the transfer of ownership of a material deemed important to national security — uranium, amounting to one-fifth of U.S. reserves (a fraction re-estimated by the NRC at closer to one-tenth of the United States’ uranium production capacity in 2017) — thus requiring the approval of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), on which the U.S. Secretary of State sits but NOT voting major member.

During the same time frame that the acquisition took place, the Clinton Foundation accepted contributions from nine individuals associated with Uranium One totaling more than $100 million, book written by the discredited author of the book: CLINTON CASH): Peter Schweizer, former Sarah Palin campaign operative.

Peter Schweizer’s book is poorly written, sloppily documented, and proves nothing that suggested any wrongdoing by either Bill or Hillary Clinton.


B/L: This is how the GOP operates: They duck, dodge, deflect, and deny everything away from themselves while painting all DEMS, Hillary Clinton, and Obama and devils and the worst people ever on Earth – this is their latest stunt. Will it work – probably?

Thanks for stopping by and stay tuned for more on this subject and dirty tricks.




No comments: