Top 5
Involved in the Latest Criminal Investigation
(Trump's Inaugural
Committee)
Introduction: Another Criminal Investigation of
Trump (Rolling
Stone):
The wheel of investigations related to Trump
has spun back around to his inaugural committee. SDNY federal investigators
issued a wide-ranging subpoena for officials managing the nonprofit
organization to turn over documents related to donors, contractors, disclosure
filings and more.
Reportedly of interest
are a host of potential violations: (1) money laundering, (2) election fraud, (3) false
statements to the FEC, (4) and acceptance of foreign contributions (which is
illegal).
The Trump inaugural committee brought
in a record $107 million in donations and, somehow, spent nearly
all of it. Obama’s 2009 inaugural committee raised a then-record of $55 million
(Obama’s 2013 committee raised $43 million).
More from this Rolling Stone piece follows the next section:
President
Trump’s inaugural committee received a sweeping subpoena from the US Attorney’s
Office for the SDNY – meaning criminal
investigations into the inauguration’s money (Vox.com here) are heating up.
The scope of
documents requested in the subpoena and potential crimes investigators are
probing are both remarkable — investigating everything from false statements to
money laundering.
Investigators
are said to be interested in the inaugural committee’s spending, its donations,
whether any donations came from illegal foreign sources, and potential
corruption involving favors for donors.
Since last
year, there have
been reports that special counsel Robert Mueller was investigating
potential foreign donations to the inaugural committee. In December, news
broke that federal prosecutors in NY were overseeing a broader probe into
the inauguration and its money.
Rick Gates, the former Trump campaign
aide who helped run the inaugural committee and struck a plea deal with Mueller in February, has
also been cooperating with SDNY prosecutors, per the Wall
Street Journal.
Michael Cohen, Trump’s
former lawyer, known as “The Fixer” helped fund raise for the inaugural, and
his is another major figure, though it’s not entirely clear whether he’s
helping out with the investigation or whether he’s a target of it.
What the subpoena demanded from
Trump’s inaugural committee. The Wall
Street Journal reports that the documents the government is demanding from
the inaugural committee include:
· “All documents related to the
committee’s donors and vendors”
· All records related to “benefits”
provided to donors
· Documents related to the financier Imaad Zuberi and his company
Avenue Ventures LLC. (He is the only donor specifically named in the
subpoena. The Daily
Beast has previously reported on Zuberi’s connections to Michael Cohen.)
· Documents related to donations “made
by or on behalf of foreign nationals,” including communications about possible
donations from foreign individuals
· Documents related to “donations or
payments made by donors directly to contractors and/or vendors.” (The Journal
reports that there was some discussion on the inaugural committee about having
donors pay vendors for the inauguration directly — which could violate
disclosure laws.)
The New
York Times reports that the subpoena also asks for documents about Stripe,
a startup that processes credit card payments, for which Jared Kushner’s brother (Josh Kushner) is an investor.
Meanwhile,
CNN reports
that the subpoena specifically names several different offenses that
investigators are probing:
· False statements
· Mail fraud
· Wire fraud
· Money laundering
· Inaugural committee disclosure
violations
· “Violations of laws prohibiting
contributions by foreign nations and contributions in the name of another
person, also known as straw donors.”
More
now from Rolling Stone: Suspicions over how the committee spent its money were raised as early
as the summer of 2017.
After the
committee filed its tax returns the next February, the New York Times reported
on a trove of questionable expenditures suggesting the committee may have been
little more than a nine-figure slush fund.
In May, ABC
News reported that Special Counsel Robert Mueller was questioning witnesses —
including committee chairman Thomas Barrack — about donations to the committee,
specifically those coming from donors with connections to Russia, Saudi Arabia,
the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.
The only
individual named in the subpoena is venture capitalist Imaad Zuberi, who has
connections to some of the countries flagged by Mueller. Records show that
Zuberi’s firm, Avenue Ventures, donated $900,000 to the committee. In December
2016, Zuberi visited Trump Tower in New York with incoming NSC Adviser Michael Flynn.
Flynn along
with former Trump campaign CEO Steve
Bannon was scheduled to meet with a delegation from Qatar.
Though he
wasn’t in the meetings with Trump officials, Zuberi also met with the Qataris
at Trump Tower, and then met with the Qatari foreign minister the following
day. The Washington Post points to Facebook posts that place Zuberi in Saudi
Arabia and the UAE days later.
Steve Rabinowitz, a spokesman for
Zuberi, told ABC News: “Imaad knows nothing about a
subpoena, other than what is being written. It is well known that after
supporting President Obama and later Hillary Clinton that Imaad gave generously
and directly to the Trump inaugural committee, but many others gave
substantially more. If, in fact, he is named in this subpoena, never mind
somehow named alone, he is bewildered why.”
Though no one associated with the Trump campaign or
Trump administration has been targeted specifically for their work on the
inaugural committee, there is some
overlap.
Much of the committee’s fundraising efforts were led
by Rick Gates, a senior campaign
official who along with campaign manager Paul
Manafort was indicted as part of Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation.
Last
February, Gates pleaded guilty to several charges and has reportedly been
cooperating with both the special counsel’s office and the SDNY.
He even
testified against his longtime colleague Paul Manafort last August. While on
the stand, Gates allowed that it is “possible
that he drew up false expense reports” so that he could steal from the
inaugural committee. The SDNY may soon
know for sure.
My 2 cents: And we all wait with bated breath as
the expression says.
Stay tuned, and thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment