Conflicted GOP (Super PR Stunt)
[click image for larger view]
GOP Plan for the ACA (Obama-care)
(Oops, no replacement plan right now)
[click image for larger view, but not really necessary]
[click image for larger view, but not really necessary]
Historical Healthcare Cost
Facts
[click chart for larger view]
FROM
the Heritage Foundation and their PAC: “Heritage Action”
“It
simply cannot be overstated, S. CON. RES. 3 represents
the only mechanism to expedite the Obamacare repeal process and thus deliver on
six years of campaign promises.”
(I Note: So a campaign promise is the key to tossing 20 million Americans under the bus or in the nearest sewer - I see, I see).
(Updated: It did pass the Senate 51-48 and the House (235-188) straight party line with 4 GOPers who did not vote. The 4 are pending Trump nominees for higher office).
And
the Heritage threat or promise to the GOP (mostly to the GOP): We support S. CON. RES
3 and will include it as a key vote on our legislative scorecard to measure how
members voted.
Let’s
be very clear on this S. Con Resolution 3 (Senate Concurrent Resolution number 3) is NOT law. So, what are concurrent
resolutions? (Mostly flair for political points back home).
1. It
is a resolution passed by both the House and Senate but is not
presented to the President and does not have the force of law.
2. In
contrast, joint resolutions and bills are presented to the
President and once signed, or approved over a veto, then if enacted, have the full force of law.
Concurrent
resolutions are generally used to address the sentiments of both chambers or to deal with
issues or matters affecting both houses. Examples of what concurrent
resolution address are things like the budget and spending limits and now today,
set the scene to repeal the ACA (Obama-care).
Current
Resolutions do not have the full force of law based on a 1983 USSC decision that
ruled the practice was unconstitutional the case of INS v. Chadha 462 U.S. 919. And thus ended that practice
since they were also sometimes used to override executive actions via a
mechanism known as the legislative veto, thus
not legal.
More
from those whacko’s at the Heritage:
The
importance of repealing Obamacare is more than simply fulfilling a campaign
promise; it is about beginning the process of expanding choice in and lowering
costs of a health care system that is currently bankrupting the nation, hurting
hardworking Americans, and slowing economic growth. There is no mystery
why Americans, on everyday matters that directly concern them, continue to
oppose the ACA law (Obamacare) law. Those reasons:
1. Health insurance premiums
continue to burden businesses and families.
2. Obamacare generates big and
surprising out-of-pocket costs.
3. Obamacare reduces insurance
competition and consumer choice.
4. Obamacare destroys jobs and
discourages employment.
5. The overall health care cost
curve is “bending” upward.
6. Obamacare imposes major tax
increases on America’s middle class.
7. Medicare payment cuts
threaten seniors’ future access to care.
8. Obamacare increases deficits
and debt.
9. Obamacare forces Americans,
in direct violation of their rights of conscience, to fund abortion through
their own tax dollars.
10. Obamacare imposes arbitrary
rules and costly mandates.
I
say the GOP’s hatred for Mr. Obama still drives this argument and has since 2010 (when it became law) and probably ever since Mr. Obama took office nearly a full 8 years ago (Noon on Jan 20, 2009) even as the
country faced the darkest economic days since the Great Depression. In short, this GOP has no shame, yet they remain shameful.
Their illogical argument follows: Obama is bad and thus so are his policies awful, just
terrible, horrible in fact (sounds like words Trump repeats in the same
sentence), so we must repeal and replace the ACA (Obamacare) and everything he
ever signed into law or by Executive Order since 2009 and then erase any record
of him ever even have serve as president…
Related
sites with good info:
1. ABC
News.
So,
can the GOP be one huge bunch of liars and fact seekers at the same time? I say
nope, but watch them try their darndest.
No comments:
Post a Comment