Psst: I hope the mic is not hot
New Story, New Twist: Call
to the outside media are coming from inside the White House — or near it, at
least, or so it seems – the Q is: Why and from whom?
A
remarkable set of facts about The New York Times Sunday (July 9) report
of the meeting of a Kremlin-linked lawyer and Donald J. Trump Jr., Jared
Kushner, and Paul Manafort is (1) “that the story was sourced to three advisers
to the White House, (2) briefed to them about the meeting, and (3) also to two
others with knowledge of it.”
Subsequently,
the Times obtained Trump Jr.'s email exchange with the publicist Rob Goldstone
to set up the meeting with the Russian lawyer.
That is the exchange during which Goldstone
promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton
obtained “as part of Russia and its government's
support for Mr. Trump.”
Jr. responded not
by saying: “What Russian effort to
support my dad?” but rather, he was giddy
and wrote back: “I love it especially for later in the summer.”
FACTS: The Times cannot have gotten the emails from Goldstone. Why not?
•
The Times knew that Trump Jr. had “forwarded the entire email chain to Jared
Kushner's company work email
•
Also, forwarded to Paul Manafort at his Trump campaign email address.
• Goldstone wasn't included on that forwarded
mail (can be seen clearly from his own publication of the email chain on
Twitter, but only after The Times called him for comment about it for their
follow-up story.
Thus,
five people in or around the White House have been spilling highly
incriminating information to The Times about Don Jr.'s meeting via an email
chain that only Kushner, Manafort, and Don Jr. had possession of, but they made
their way to The Times. How is the key question? All this raises a bunch of other interesting questions, like:
1. Why are some people close to the White House
trying to destroy Trump Jr?
2. People also acting in such a way that risks
destroying the whole Trump presidency along the way.
3. Why the dribs and drabs of info in a manner
designed to inflict maximum political damage?
4. And, is it a mere coincidence that this is
happening right after the president's long meeting with Vladimir Putin?
Who
knows for sure, but one can imagine that there must be some group of people in
or around the administration who believe they stand to gain from these
disclosures – again, why?
Some
might say it's possible they're disclosing the info effort at “collusion
themselves” for altruistic or patriotic reasons – but that seems very likely,
so why?
My Hunch: Maybe
for revenge, out of some sort of anger, some sort of political disgust or
dislike, or for a whole lot of money, or just simply to get attention and thus fame
around the globe? Again, who knows – but the public does have a right to know. Interesting
story isn’t it nonetheless?
Source
is the Business Insider here.
More
later I am sure.
No comments:
Post a Comment